不同林龄杉木林生态功能评价及障碍因子分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京林业大学水土保持学院;2.长汀县水土保持中心;3.北京市水务局政务服务中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Evaluation of Ecological Functions and Analysis of Limiting Factors in Cunninghamia lanceolata Forests of Different Stand Ages

Author:
Affiliation:

College of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]为科学评价福建省长汀县楼子坝国有林场不同林龄杉木林的生态功能综合状况,明确其主要影响因素与提升方向,为该区域杉木林生态经营与功能优化提供数据支撑和科学依据。[方法]选取该林场5个不同林龄的杉木林设置代表性样地,从水源涵养、保育土壤和林下植被多样性3个维度,选取14个指标构建综合评价体系;采用层次分析法确定指标权重,结合加权综合指数法量化生态功能综合评价值,运用系统障碍度模型识别制约生态功能提升的关键障碍因子。[结果]①杉木林生态功能综合评价值排序为11 a(0.72)>7—8 a(0.31)>3—4 a(0.28),评价等级分别为Ⅱ级、Ⅳ级、Ⅳ级,生态功能总体随林龄增长呈提升趋势。②随着林龄增加,水源涵养和保育土壤功能呈提升趋势,林下植被多样性功能呈下降趋势。③不同林龄段杉木林的核心障碍因子存在显著阶段性差异,3—4 a以枯落物有效拦蓄量、土壤有效蓄水量、土壤侵蚀强度为主,7—8 a以枯落物有效拦蓄量、土壤有机质含为主,11 a以土壤有效蓄水量、Shannon-Wiener 指数、Simpson 指数为主。[结论]针对该区域杉木林生态经营与功能优化,应实施差异化改善策略,针对3—4 a林分可人工增施混合枯落物,沿等高线设置鱼鳞坑与截水沟;针对7—8 a林分采用沟施方式施用腐熟落叶肥或有机肥,引入乡土阔叶树构建混交林;针对11 a林分采取林下植被调控措施,适度保留乡土灌木和草本植物,并进行混交改造。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] In order to scientifically evaluate the comprehensive ecological function status of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests of different stand ages in Louziaba State-owned Forest Farm of Changting County in Fujian Province, clarify the main influencing factors and improvement directions, and provide data support and scientific basis for the ecological management and functional optimization of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests in this region. [Method] Representative sample plots were set up in five Cunninghamia lanceolata forests of different stand ages in the forest farm, and a comprehensive evaluation system was established by selecting 14 indicators from three dimensions including water conservation, soil conservation and understory vegetation diversity. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was adopted to determine the index weights, the weighted comprehensive index method was used to quantify the comprehensive evaluation value of ecological functions, and the system obstacle degree model was applied to identify the key obstacle factors restricting the improvement of ecological functions. [Result] ① The comprehensive evaluation values of ecological functions of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests were ranked as 11 a (0.72) > 7?8 a (0.31) > 3?4 a (0.28), with the corresponding evaluation grades being Grade Ⅱ, Grade Ⅳ and Grade Ⅳ respectively, indicating that the ecological functions showed an overall increasing trend with the growth of stand age. (2) With the increase of stand age, the functions of water conservation and soil conservation presented an increasing trend, while the function of understory vegetation diversity showed a decreasing trend. (3) There were significant stage-specific differences in the core obstacle factors of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests in different stand age stages. The main obstacle factors for 3?4 a stands were effective litter retention capacity, soil effective water storage capacity and soil erosion intensity; those for 7?8 a stands were effective litter retention capacity and soil organic matter content; and those for 11 a stands were soil effective water storage capacity, Shannon-Wiener index and Simpson index. [Conclusion] For the ecological management and functional optimization of Cunninghamia lanceolata forests in this region, differentiated improvement strategies should be implemented. For 3?4 a stands, mixed litters can be artificially applied, and fish-scale pits and intercepting ditches can be built along contour lines; for 7?8 a stands, decomposed leaf fertilizer or organic fertilizer can be applied by furrow application, and native broad-leaved trees can be introduced to construct mixed forests; for 11 a stands, understory vegetation regulation measures should be taken to properly retain native shrubs and herbs, and carry out mixed forest transformation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-25
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-10
  • 录用日期:2026-02-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: