《花岗岩残积土浅层滑坡区优先流特征与水力响应》
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.福州大学 紫金地质与矿业学院;2.福建省地质灾害重点实验室;3.自然资源部丘陵山地地质灾害防治重点实验室;4.福建省地质科学研究院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Priority Flow Characteristics and Hydraulic Response in Shallow Landslide Zones of Granite Residual Soils
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    极端降雨频发背景下,优先流作为影响滑坡区土体水分运移和稳定性的关键机制,亟需深入研究。本文聚焦花岗岩残积土浅层滑坡区,选取三类典型土体(木荷覆盖残积土 MH、裸露残积土 BR、全风化花岗岩 QW),通过野外染色示踪实验与图像处理技术,分析优先流在剖面中的空间分布特征与参数。结果揭示优先流在不同土体结构中的演化规律,并探讨其与土体结构特征之间的内在联系,为滑坡形成机制提供了理论依据。本研究定量揭示了不同类型花岗岩残积土中优先流特征的差异性与结构控制机制:1.三种典型土体的剖面中均检测到优先流,但其空间分布和强度存在显著差异;2.优先流面积比随深度递减,且剖面水平分布表现出高度非均质性,反映出土体结构对水分运移路径的强控制作用;3优先流评价指数(PFI)在不同土体间差异显著,木荷覆盖残积土(MH)最高(0.5969),表明其结构更利于形成强优先流;裸露残积土(BR)最低(0.3254),水分渗透主要受限于孔隙发育程度;4.PFI有效量化了优先流的强度和渗透深度,揭示了土体结构差异对浅层水分快速入渗的驱动机制。本研究拓展了优先流在花岗岩残积土滑坡区的定量表征方法,为相关水文模型构建和滑坡灾害风险评估提供了新思路。

    Abstract:

    Against the backdrop of increasingly frequent extreme rainfall events, preferential flow has emerged as a critical mechanism affecting soil water movement and slope stability in landslide-prone areas, necessitating in-depth investigation. This study focuses on shallow landslide zones in granite residual soils, selecting three typical soil types—Lithocarpus-covered residual soil (MH), exposed residual soil (BR), and completely weathered granite (QW). Through field dye tracing experiments and image processing techniques, the spatial distribution characteristics and parameters of preferential flow within soil profiles were analyzed. The results reveal the evolution patterns of preferential flow across different soil structures and explore the intrinsic relationship between preferential flow and soil structural features, thereby providing theoretical support for understanding landslide formation mechanisms. The study quantitatively identifies differences in preferential flow characteristics and structural control mechanisms among different types of granite residual soils:1.Preferential flow was detected in all three soil profiles, but with significant differences in spatial distribution and intensity;2.The proportion of preferential flow area decreased with depth, and its horizontal distribution within profiles showed high heterogeneity, indicating a strong structural control over water movement pathways;3.The preferential flow index (PFI) varied significantly among the soil types, with the highest in MH (0.5969), suggesting its structure favors strong preferential flow, and the lowest in BR (0.3254), where water infiltration is mainly limited by the degree of pore development;4.PFI effectively quantified the intensity and infiltration depth of preferential flow, revealing how structural differences drive rapid shallow water infiltration.This study expands the quantitative characterization methods of preferential flow in granite residual soil landslide areas, offering new insights for hydrological modeling and landslide risk assessment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-15
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-03
  • 录用日期:2026-02-05
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: