不同淋洗剂对滩涂围垦区土壤盐分的洗脱效果
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S275;S278

基金项目:

上海市“科技创新行动计划”社会发展科技攻关项目“滩涂盐碱地高效改良功能材料及土壤盐分洗脱—阻控技术研究”(20dz1204803)


Effects of Different Washing Reagents on Removal of Soil Salt Salinity for Coastal Reclamation Zones
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 评价淋洗剂对盐渍土盐分洗脱影响,为滩涂围垦区土壤改良提供理论指导。[方法] 以采自上海市崇明滩涂围垦区水稻田的轻度盐渍土和重度盐渍土为研究对象,比较分析了硝酸钾、硝酸铁、硝酸钙、硝酸镁和碳酸氢铵5种淋洗剂浓度和淋洗次数对土壤盐分Na+,K+,Ca2+,Mg2+,CO2-3,HCO-3,Cl-和SO2-4这8种离子的洗脱效果。[结果] 5种淋洗剂对轻度盐渍土Na+,Cl-的洗脱均有促进作用,其中以硝酸钾对Na+的洗脱作用最为明显,土壤浸出液中Na+的浓度较对照提升了9.9%~25.9%;碳酸氢铵更易促进土壤Cl-的洗脱,较对照提升了9.6%~21.2%。综合考虑淋洗剂对K+,Ca2+,Mg2+等土壤养分的淋出影响,以3.0 mmol/L硝酸钾的处理效果更佳;硝酸钾进行第二次淋洗时的Na+,Cl-,SO2-4,Ca2+的浸出浓度较低,而HCO-3和Mg2+则相反。因淋洗剂浓度较重度盐渍土盐分离子含量低,导致5种淋洗剂对重度盐渍土Na+和Cl-的洗脱效果不佳,与对照相比,分别提升了0.1%~1.0%,0.01%~4.4%。[结论] 滩涂围垦土壤改良时应根据土壤盐分离子种类与含量确定淋洗剂类型、浓度及淋洗次数;淋洗剂的施用可与灌溉措施相结合。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The effectiveness of washing reagents in removing soil salinity was evaluated to provide theoretical guidance for soil amendments in coastal reclamation zones. [Methods] Slightly and heavily saline soils of paddy fields from the Chongming coastal reclamation zones in Shanghai City were selected as the research objects, and the effects of five types of washing reagent (potassium nitrate, iron nitrate, calcium nitrate, magnesium nitrate, and ammonium bicarbonate) concentrations and extraction times on soil salinity (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, CO2-3, HCO-3, Cl-, and SO2-4) removal efficiency were compared and analyzed. [Results] The five washing reagents promoted the removal of Na+ and Cl- in the slightly saline soils, and the effect of potassium nitrate on Na+ removal efficiency was the most obvious, because the Na+ concentration in the eluate was increased by 9.9%—25.9% compared with that in the control. However, Cl- was more easily removed by ammonium bicarbonate, and the increase ratio was approximately 9.6%—21.2% compared with the control. Potassium nitrate (3.0 mmol/L) showed the best results, considering the removal of soil salt ions and the loss of soil nutrients (K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+). The Na+, Cl-, SO2-4, and Ca2+ concentrations in the eluate of the second washing by potassium nitrate were markedly lower than those after the first time, whereas it was not the case for HCO-3 and Mg2+. In this experiment, the five washing reagents showed negligible effects on the removal efficiency of Na+ and Cl- in the heavily saline soils because the applied concentration was much lower than the salt ion content in the soils, and the increase rates of the two ions were 0.10%—1.0% and 0.01%—-4.40%, respectively, compared with the control. [Conclusion] The types, concentrations and times of washing reagents should be determined according to the types and contents of soil salt ions when improves soil in coastal reclamation zones. The application of washing reagents could be combined with irrigation measures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张长波,梁晶,廖志强,马晓宇,杨桂兰.不同淋洗剂对滩涂围垦区土壤盐分的洗脱效果[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(6):31-38,45

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-15
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-09
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-30
  • 出版日期: