不同含水率条件下非饱和边坡的稳定性
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金国际合作项目“基于干涉测量和物联网技术的甘肃省南部地质灾害监测预警”(2013DFE23030);甘肃省民生科技计划项目(1503FCME006);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(lzujbky-2017-208)


Stability of Unsaturated Slope Under Different Initial Water Contents
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [28]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]试图改进现有初始条件考量方法,重点分析不同初始含水率条件下降雨入渗对边坡稳定性的作用机制,为滑坡预警提供参考。[方法]以甘肃省天水市廖集村滑坡为例,基于无前期降雨和有前期降雨作用下实测土层含水率结果,将其分别定义为天然和湿润状态,作为初始条件建立渗流与应力的流-固耦合物理力学模型。[结果]天然状态下,非饱和入渗迅速,但入渗仅局限于浅表层1-2 m,稳定系数在入渗初期显著下降,但随着下渗的停滞而缓慢变化,往往形成浅表层滑坡;湿润条件下,土体持水缓慢,但能下渗到3-4 m以下的较深部位,随着入渗深度的增大,土体软化作用加强,形成深部滑坡。所以,土体干燥状态时,进行7 d的雨量预警是有效的防灾方法。对于连阴雨天气,土层较湿润,要注重对滑坡体4 m以下部位孔隙水压力和坡脚位移形变的监测。[结论]土体初始条件对非饱和入渗和稳定性变化过程具有显著影响,是降雨触发型滑坡稳定性分析中不可忽略的因素。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To improve the existing evaluation methods on initial conditions and understand the mechanism of rainfall infiltration on slope stability, in order to provide effective suggestions for landslide early warning.[Methods] Taking Liaoji landslides in southern of Tianshui City, Gansu Province as a case study, soil was defined as a natural or wet state based on whether there was a antecedent rain. The Boltzman model was applied to turn pore water pressure into water content. And the fluid-solid coupling models were established to make a numerical analysis.[Results] In a natural state, soil absorbed the rain rapidly, and infiltration were confined in the superficial layer of 1—2 m. The stability coefficient decreased significantly in the early stage, but slowed down with the stagnation of infiltration, and formed shallow landslides ultimately, similar to plastic sliding. In wet condition, soil held water slowly, but the infiltration reached deeper position(3—4 m) and increased its pore water pressure. As the increase of infiltration depth, the process of soil softening became stronger and stronger and the sliding surface was often occurred in the deep position. When the soil was dry, the 7-day rainfall warming was an effective method for disaster warming. While in the rainy weather, soil kept in wet, and the pore water pressure blow 4 m and the slope displacement should be monitored.[Conclusion] The initial conditions of soil have significant impact on the process of unsaturated seepage and stability changes. Consequently, it is an integrant factor in stability analysis of rain-induced landslides.

    参考文献
    [1] 段钊,彭建兵,王启耀.泾阳南塬黄土滑坡的运动规律与液化效应[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):46-49.
    [2] Ali A, Huang J, Lyamin A V, et al. Boundary effects of rainfall-induced landslides[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2014,61(4):341-354.
    [3] Rahardjo H, Ong T H, Rezaur R B, et al. Factors controlling instability of homogeneous soil slopes under rainfall[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007,133(12):1532-1543.
    [4] 朱伟,程南军,陈学东,等.浅谈非饱和渗流的几个基本问题[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(2):235-240.
    [5] 袁俊平,褚飞飞,季李通.饱和:非饱和非稳定渗流数值分析中初始状态的研究[J].水利水电技术,2006,37(9):5-7.
    [6] 付建新,宋卫东,杜建华.考虑二维降雨入渗的非饱和土边坡瞬态体积含水率分析[J].工程科学学报,2015(4):407-413.
    [7] Rahimi M, Faza M. Characterization of shallow landslide through rainfall modeL[J]. Tissue Antigens, 2013,57(1):80-92.
    [8] 詹良通,贾官伟,陈云敏,等.考虑土体非饱和特性的无限长斜坡降雨入渗解析解[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(8):1214-1220.
    [9] 唐栋,李典庆,周创兵,等.考虑前期降雨过程的边坡稳定性分析[J].岩土力学,2013,34(11):3239-3248.
    [10] 罗红明.降雨入渗条件下滑坡非饱和渗流特性与稳定性研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2008.
    [11] Segoni S, Leoni L, Benedetti A I, et al. Towards a definition of a real-time forecasting network for rainfall induced shallow landslides.[J]. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, 2009,9(6):2119-2133.
    [12] 张成航,张茂省,于国强.天水市群发地质灾害特征与成灾机理[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):46-50.
    [13] Li Weichao, Lee M L, Cai Hong, et al. Combined roles of saturated permeability and rainfall characteristics on surficial failure of homogeneous soil slope[J]. Engineering Geology, 2013,153(2):105-113.
    [14] 高润德,彭良泉,王钊.雨水入渗作用下非饱和土边坡的稳定性分析[J].人民长江,2001,32(11):25-27.
    [15] Lu Ning, William J L.非饱和土力学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2012:35-37.
    [16] Mckee C, Bumb A. The importance of unsaturated flow parameters in designing a hazardous waste site[C]//Hazardous Wastes and Environmental Emergencies(Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute National Conference). Houston, TX, 1984:50-58.
    [17] 吴玮江,王念秦.甘肃滑坡灾害[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,2006.
    [18] 包承纲.非饱和土的性状及膨胀土边坡稳定问题[J].岩土工程学报,2004,26(1):1-15.
    [19] 李爱国,岳中琦,谭国焕,等.土体含水率和吸力量测及其对边坡稳定性的影响[J].岩土工程学报,2003,25(3):278-282.
    [20] 崔冠英,朱济祥.水利工程地质[M].4版.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008:35-36.
    [21] 李萍,李同录,王红,等.非饱和黄土土-水特征曲线与渗透系数Childs&Collis-Geroge模型预测[J].岩土力学,2013(S2):184-189.
    [22] 杨仲康,陈冠,孟兴民,等.基于现场渗透试验的黄土滑坡体入渗特性[J].兰州大学学报:自科版,2017,53(3):285-291.
    [23] Peng Jianbin, Fan Zhongjie, Wu Di, et al. Heavy rainfall triggered loess-mudstone landslide and subsequent debris flow in Tianshui, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015,186:79-90.
    [24] 加拿大GEO-SLOPE国际有限公司.非饱和土体渗流分析软件SEEP/W用户指南[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2011.
    [25] Liu Chianan. Progressive failure mechanism in one-dimensional stability analysis of shallow slope failures[J]. Landslides, 2009,6(2):129-137.
    [26] Francesca C, Victor S, Springmansarah M. Hydromechanical behaviour of a silty sand from a steep slope triggered.[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013,50(1):28-40.
    [27] 于国强,张茂省,胡炜.天水市"7·25"群发性山洪地质灾害发育特征及成因分析[J].西北地质,2014,47(3):185-191.
    [28] Peng Jianbin, Fan Zhongjie, Wu Di, et al. Heavy rainfall triggered loess-mudstone landslide and subsequent debris flow in Tianshui, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015,186:79-90.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

鲜丹,杨仲康.不同含水率条件下非饱和边坡的稳定性[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):123-129

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1063
  • 下载次数: 1235
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-21
  • 最后修改日期:2018-12-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-06