不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“多元化利用方式下的农村生活能源消费行为与区域模式研究”(4101555);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2015M439)


Consumer Behavior of Rural Household Energy and Its Influential Factors Based on Different Livelihood Models
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 分析不同生计方式下农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素,为区域制定能源利用与环境保护规划及政策提供参考。[方法] 基于西安市城郊地区381份调查问卷,采用优势能源系数法与Tobit模型开展研究。[结果] (1)纯农户主要使用秸秆、玉米芯、薪柴等生物质能源,经济性、可获性优先;兼业户生物质能、液化气和太阳能使用突出,可获性与便捷性兼顾,呈现互补性消费;非农户优势能源为煤及其制品、电能、太阳能等商品能源,便捷性、清洁性与高效性优先。(2)可获得性是影响纯农户生物质能消费的关键因素,主要体现在作物种植面积的多少,人均收入提高会减少其消耗;非农户生物质资源缺乏,煤及其制品、电能为主要生活用能,常住人口越多,煤炭、电能消费量越大,人均收入、家庭有效最高受教育程度对电能消费正向影响;兼业户液化气、太阳能消费受家庭规模与人均收入影响明显。[结论] 农户生活能源消费行为受家庭特征、人均收入、能源可获得性等方面影响,纯农、兼业、非农3种生计方式伴随收入水平提高以及商品化、高质化用能的演替过程,呈现了生活用能的阶梯提高。城郊农户大量使用排放系数较高的煤及其制品,不利于城市地区环境改善,应重视这类群体的用能导向和管理。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Consumer behavior of rural household energy and its influencing factors of different livelihood models were analyzed, which can provide reference for the development of energy utilization and environmental protection planning and policy.[Methods] 381 survey questionnaires in suburban area of Xi'an City were collected. Dominant energy coefficient method and the Tobit model method were used.[Results] Consumer behavior of rural household energy is influenced by livelihood model. Biomass energy such as straw, corncob and firewood are mainly used by the pure agricultural households, in which economy and availability of energy consumption are concerned firstly; coal and its products, electricity, solar energy and other commercial energy are prominent in the non-agricultural households, where the convenience, clean and high efficiency of energy use are preferred; as for households with combined occupations, the advantageous energies as biomass energy, liquefied petroleum gas and solar energy were preferred from the view of availability and convenience. The key factors affecting biomass energy consumption is the availability of energy. This is mainly reflected by the planted area, but per capita income increase will reduce biomass energy consumption. The non-agricultural households of the suburbs are lack of the biomass energy, coal and its products and electrical energy are the dominant household energy. The more resident population. the larger consumption. At the same time, the per capita income, and the effective family highest education level have the positive influence on the electrical energy consumption. Liquefied petroleum gas and solar energy consumption of households with combined occupations is mainly affected by family size and per capita income.[Conclusion] Consumer behavior of rural household energy is affected by family characteristics, per capita income, energy availability, and so on. With the increase of income level, and development of energy commercialization and the quality, all of the three livelihoods presented an improved energy use step by step. Around city center, coal and its products with high emission coefficient are not encouraged to use frequently. And that's not conducive to improve the environment of urban region, so attention should be paid to the energy consumption orientation of these groups.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张敬飒,吴文恒,朱虹颖,孙锦锦.不同生计方式农户生活能源消费行为及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(6):265-271

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-20
  • 最后修改日期:2016-04-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-01-13
  • 出版日期: