原状土冲刷法与人工模拟降雨法研究土壤抗冲性对比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison Anal ysis on Soil Anti-scourabil ity Between Undisturbed Sampling and Artificial Rainfall Plot
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在相同条件下, 对比研究了人工模拟降雨小区(2m×2m)和用大型抗冲槽(10cm×20cm×10cm)测定的土壤侵蚀量、产沙过程及抗冲性异同。结果表明在0.65mm/min和0.84mm/min雨强15min冲刷时间内, 大型抗冲槽侵蚀模数为人工降雨小区的200~400倍, 但二者存在一定量关系。抗冲槽侵蚀过程与人工降雨小区呈相反趋势。径流深为小区的50~145倍, 单位径流深引起的侵蚀模数为小区的5~7倍(裸地)和1.8~4.5倍(人工草地)。本文分析了二者侵蚀过程差异及形成原因。研究还发现大型抗冲槽与小型抗冲槽所测侵蚀模数存在定量关系, 在一定范围内小型槽可以取代大型槽进行抗冲性测定。

    Abstract:

    The soil loss.sediment yield and process as well as soil anti-scourability were tested on field artificial runoff plot and undisturbed soil sampling(lOcmX20cmXlOcm)under the same conditions.The result showed that soil sample washing method was 200-400times of soil loss than in the runoff plot in 15 minutes with rainfall of 0.65 and 0.84 mm/min.The erosion process in soil sample washing was different from in runoff plot.The runoff depth in former was 50~150 times and erosion modules was 5-7times(bare land)and 1.8-4.5 times(pasture)of in runoff plot.The reason of such difference was analysised.It was also found that there exited relation of sediment yield between samples of large size(lOcmX20cm XlOcm)and small size(3.5cm X 20cm X 4cm), and sediment yield in former can be estimated by small one.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘国彬,张光辉.原状土冲刷法与人工模拟降雨法研究土壤抗冲性对比分析[J].水土保持通报,1996,(2):32-37

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:1995-04-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-11-28
  • 出版日期: