洮河流域生态系统服务价值地形梯度特征及驱动因素研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.甘肃农业大学;2.甘肃农业大学管理学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

甘肃省自然科学基金项目“土地利用变化背景下洮河流域生态系统服务价值时空格局演化”(24JRRA641)


Study on the topographic gradient characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem service value in Taohe River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘 要:[目的]洮河流域地处青藏高原与黄土高原的过渡带,其地貌特征受两大高原复合作用影响显著,同时作为重要的生态屏障区承担着水源涵养等关键生态系统服务功能,探究流域地形梯度特征下的生态系统服务价值空间分异及驱动因素对实现流域可持续发展具有重要的理论和实践意义。[方法]本研究基于1993—2023年6期土地利用遥感数据,综合运用生态系统服务价值(ESV)核算模型、地形分布指数和地理探测器方法,系统探究流域近30年生态系统服务价值的时空演变规律及其地形梯度特征与驱动机制。[结果]结果表明:(1)流域地形梯度呈现典型阶梯式分布特征,84.99%的区域集中分布于第2-7梯度,其中梯度1-9的优势地类依次表现为建设用地-水域-耕地-草地-林地-林地-林地-未利用地-未利用地的递变格局;(2)研究期间流域ESV总量增加6.39×10?元(增幅2.36%),其空间分布沿着地形梯度(由低到高)呈现先增后减的梯度分异特征,高值区主要分布于靠近青藏高原的第5、7梯度,低值区则集中于黄土高原西南部的梯度1和梯度9区域;(3)ESV梯度分异是自然地理要素与社会经济要素协同作用的结果,其中高程(DEM)作为主导解释因子(q=0.491),与坡度、土地利用强度等因子的交互作用均呈现双因子增强效应。[结论]本研究揭示了山地过渡带生态系统服务价值的地形梯度响应特征,为流域生态空间优化管理和区域可持续发展提供科学支撑。

    Abstract:

    [Objective]Located in the transitional zone between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Loess Plateau, the Tao River Basin exhibits distinctive geomorphological features shaped by the combined effects of these two plateaus. As a critical ecological barrier, it plays a pivotal role in providing key ecosystem services such as water conservation, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the spatial differentiation of ecosystem service value and driving factors of watershed topographic gradient to realize the sustainable development of watershed.[method]This study employed six phases of land-use remote sensing data (1993–2023) and integrated the ecosystem service value (ESV) assessment model, terrain distribution index, and geographical detector method to systematically explore the spatial and temporal evolution law, the topographic gradient characteristics and driving mechanism of ecosystem service value in recent 30 years. [Results]The results reveal that: (1) The basin displays a typical stepped topographic gradient distribution, with 84.99% of its area concentrated in gradients 2–7. Dominant land-use types across gradients 1–9 follow a sequential transition: construction land–water bodies–cropland–grassland–forestland–forestland–forestland–unused land–unused land. (2) The total ESV increased by 6.39×10?yuan (a 2.36% rise). Its spatial distribution shows a gradient differentiation characteristic of first increasing and then decreasing along the terrain gradient from low to high. High ESV values were predominantly distributed in gradients 5 and 7 (adjacent to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau), while low values clustered in gradient 1 and gradient 9 regions within the southwestern Loess Plateau. (3) ESV gradient differentiation arises from the synergistic interaction of natural geographic and socioeconomic factors, with elevation (DEM) serving as the dominant explanatory factor (q = 0.491). Its interactions with slope and land-use intensity demonstrate two-factor enhancement effects. [Conclusion]This study clarifies the topographic gradient response characteristics of ecosystem service values in mountainous transitional zones, offering scientific insights for optimizing ecological spatial management and advancing regional sustainable development in river basins.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-24
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-23
  • 录用日期:2025-06-27
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: