文章摘要
张锐,邹露,胡锋,郑华伟.农用地整治项目农户满意度分析[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):350~356
农用地整治项目农户满意度分析
Farmers' Satisfaction of Rural Land Consolidation Project
投稿时间:2018-05-12  修订日期:2018-05-17
DOI:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2018.04.055
中文关键词: 农用地整治  农户满意度  IPA法  诊断
英文关键词: rural land consolidation  farmers'satisfaction  IPA analysis  diagnosis
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“农村土地整治生态风险管控研究”(71403130);国土资源部法律评价工程重点实验室开放资助项目(CUGFP-1705);国土资源部海岸带开发与保护重点实验室开放资助项目(2017CZEPK14);江苏省国土资源科技项目(2018028; 2015005);南京农业大学校级教改项目(2015Y042)
作者单位E-mail
张锐 南京农业大学 资源与环境科学学院, 江苏 南京 210095  
邹露 南京农业大学 人文与社会发展学院, 江苏 南京 210095  
胡锋 南京农业大学 资源与环境科学学院, 江苏 南京 210095  
郑华伟 南京农业大学 人文与社会发展学院, 江苏 南京 210095
南京农业大学 区域农业研究院, 江苏 南京 210095 
huaweizheng2008@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 59
全文下载次数: 67
中文摘要:
      [目的]诊断基于农户满意度的农用地整治项目绩效水平,为相关政策的制定提供科学依据。[方法]建立基于农户满意度的农用地整治项目绩效测度指标体系,运用综合评价法、配对样本T检验、IPA分析法分析农用地整治项目绩效水平及其影响因素。[结果]农用地整治项目农户满意度得分达到3.747 5,其绩效水平达到“良好”等级,农用地整治项目结果绩效水平高于过程绩效水平。影响农用地整治项目农户满意度高低的因素主要包括立项决策农户意见采纳程度、规划设计征询农户意见情况、规划设计农户意见采纳程度、后期管护主体明确程度、生产成本降低、后期管护制度健全程度、后期管护资金供给程度、后期管护措施完善程度、立项决策农户参与程度、农业规模生产、生物多样性保护、农田抗灾能力、农田防护林质量、竣工验收中农户参与情况等。[结论]基于农户满意度建立的农用地整治项目绩效测度指标体系和运用综合评价法、配对样本T检验、IPA分析法分析农用地整治项目绩效水平是合理可行的。
英文摘要:
      [Objective] This paper aimed to diagnosis the level of the rural land consolidation project performance based on the farmers' satisfaction in order to provide some references for policy making.[Methods] The evaluation index system of rural land consolidation project performance was constructed based on the farmers' satisfaction, then the empirical analysis was conducted by comprehensive evaluation method, paired sample T test and the IPA(importance performance analysis) analysis.[Results] The farmers' satisfaction of the rural land consolidation project was 3.747 5, and the rural land consolidation project performance level was in the "good" class. The project result performance level was higher than the process performance level. The important factors impacting rural land consolidation project performance level mainly included the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of the decision-making, consultation with farmers' opinions in the stage of planning programming, the adoption degree of farmers' opinions in the stage of planning programming, the clear subject of final management maintenance, production cost reduction, the sound system of final management maintenance, the supply of funds for the final management maintenance, the perfect measures of final management maintenance, the degree of farmers' participation in the stage of the decision making, agricultural scale production, the biodiversity conservation, the ability of fighting natural calamities for farmland, quality of farmland shelterbelts, farmers' participation in the completion acceptance, and so on.[Conclusion] They are reasonable and feasible that the evaluation index system of the rural land consolidation project performance was established based on the farmers' satisfaction, while the level of the rural land consolidation project performance was diagnosed by comprehensive evaluation method, paired sample T test and the IPA analysis.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭